- From: <yodaiken_at_fsmlabs.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 16:38:25 -0700
What you have done is interesting. It's too bad you used a known non-working patch and didn't bother to figure out how easy it is to simply avoid the scheduler entirely on RTL 3.2/Free. In Pro we have decided to make the scheduler mandatory, but it is quite a bit optimized. In RTL/Free you don't even have to load the scheduler module and you can have a user thread attach. The original design theory was that people would want to pop schedulers in and out and that we did not want to require a scheduler be there for simple interrupt driven applications. In practice, people seem to always want the scheduler. just as a general tip: if you measure X and many other people have measured something much different, you should make and effort to find out why. On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 12:27:00AM +0100, Dominic wrote: > > - open source > - template based code-generator > - generated c-code is quite fast > - suitable for embedded systems > - supports real-time linux gpl and comedi > - well documented > - expects users to play with ;-) > > For a list of features and the documentation along with the source: > > http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~hillbr/public/ > > > Ciao, > Dominic > > P.S. Have fun with it :-) > > _______________________________________________ > Rtl mailing list > Rtl_at_rtlinux.org > http://www2.fsmlabs.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/rtl -- --------------------------------------------------------- Victor Yodaiken Finite State Machine Labs: The RTLinux Company. www.fsmlabs.com www.rtlinux.com 1+ 505 838 9109
Received on 2002-11-15Z23:38:25