- From: Herman Bruyninckx <Herman.Bruyninckx_at_mech.kuleuven.ac.be>
- Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 16:05:29 +0100 (CET)
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Frank Mori Hess wrote: > On Thursday 30 January 2003 12:34 pm, Herman Bruyninckx wrote: > > But our way of getting real-time deterministic sequences of samples > > cannot be done by commands... Not with the current API, as far as I see, > > because the existing description of INSN_CONFIG is (i) not suitable for > > describing the behaviour we need > > Why do you keep saying that? It does exactly what you want to do. It lets > you tell the driver how often you want it to generate interrupts. I suspect > there is some basic misunderstanding or miscommunication happening here > because this is not that complicated. > Probably there is :-( Our trials do _not_ give what we want, and I have no problems to believe you when you hint at us making some stupid mistakes :-) Anyway, what we see is that we cannot combine continuous acquisition with asking for an interrupt each fixed numbers of scans. Or we get the interrupt as required but then the acquisition stops, or the acquisuition continues but we get an interrupt after every scan... Anyway, you've lost too much time on us by now. So, I thank you again, and we will work until we solve the "problem"! Don't bother about us any more (at least not with this questions :-) herman -- K.U.Leuven, Mechanical Engineering, Robotics Research Group <http://people.mech.kuleuven.ac.be/~bruyninc> Tel: +32 16 322480
Received on 2003-01-31Z15:05:29