- From: David Schleef <ds_at_schleef.org>
- Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 00:41:38 -0700
On Sun, Aug 03, 2003 at 05:16:59PM -0500, Frank Mori Hess wrote: > > There are 4 options: > > 1) Modify the existing configure script and try to make it work with > > 2.6. Modify the source. etc. > > I'd like to stick with 1. Agreed. I did a lot of work on this a few weeks ago as part of a transition to using automake, but never checked it in because it never fully worked (and wasn't even remotely well-tested.) There's nothing fundamentally difficult with supporting 2.6-style kernel modules in the existing makefiles, however, I certainly don't want to touch the steaming pile (which was derived from Linux-2.2.17). That system has lasted so long because it is nearly bug free on 11 architectures, 3 kernel series, a variety of random kernel configuration options, cross-compilation, and voodoo linker flags. Any potential replacement system will need to meet those requirements before being considered. dave...
Received on 2003-08-04Z06:41:38