- From: <bvds_at_bvds.geneva.edu>
- Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 15:32:15 -0400 (EDT)
> >On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 01:49:25PM -0400, bvds_at_bvds.geneva.edu wrote: >> Generally, when I have written such code, I used "size_t" instead >> of "int" to handle this issue. Would that be an acceptable fix here? > >No, because it isn't size_t. It's unsigned long, iirc. I wasn't sure if the code actually *depended* on signed vs. unsigned here. (It seemed to me that unsigned would be more appropriate.) So you would prefer something like: #ifdef __x86_64__ long iobase; #else int iobase; #endif in include/linux/comedidev.h Brett
Received on 2003-09-09Z18:32:15