Re: new kbuild

Hi!

This reminds me that I've forgotten to post the script which converts 
comedi to 2.6.x-compatible headers and adds the appropriate Kconfigs and 
Makefiles.

/Bernd


www:	http://www.berndporr.me.uk/
         http://www.linux-usb-daq.co.uk/
Mobile:	+44 (0)7769 506746
Work:	+44 (0)141 330 5237
         Department of Electronics & Electrical Engineering
         Room 519, Rankine Building, Oakfield Avenue,
         Glasgow, G12 8LT


comedi_at_scil.sinp.msu.ru wrote:
> On Mon, 31 May 2004, Frank Mori Hess wrote:
> 
> 
>>On Monday 31 May 2004 07:30 am, comedi_at_scil.sinp.msu.ru wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 31 May 2004 comedi_at_scil.sinp.msu.ru wrote:
>>>
>>>>Are there plans to adopt the comedi build system to the new kbuild
>>>>(2.6.6 and over)?
>>
>>It seems inevitable to me, as the kernel's build process for modules has
>>become so complex and fragile.
> 
> But, it is the real life.
> We have new computers, with new chipsets and processors. New disks of high
> capacity. New kernel with many features, that are faster, more stable etc.
> Note: new kbuild for side user is simple. And is active for a long time
> (V4L2 project is an example).
> 
> 
>>>I do not know (yet) how to compile (in these case) with inclusion of
>>>native comedi headers before native kernel ones. Just making all
>>
>>You can override CC, see for example the linux-gpib package, which kbuild
>>for its kernel modules.
> 
> OK, thanx.
> But, maybe, the idea to make include files with names equal to the
> native kernel includes is not so good? Some reorganization in these sphere
> will not be so terrible.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> comedi mailing list
> comedi_at_comedi.org
> https://cvs.comedi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/comedi