Re: Question about digital i/o cmd buffer data format in new driver

From: Bernd Porr <BerndPorr_at_f2s.com> · Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 14:06:52 +0000

Just can answer Q2:

 > Q2: Do you have to code in ANSI-C to execute Data Acquisition?
No. I'm using C++. See the demo programs on the DUX page.

/Bernd

www:    http://www.berndporr.me.uk/
         http://www.linux-usb-daq.co.uk/
Mobile: +44 (0)7840 340069
Work:   +44 (0)141 330 5237
         University of Glasgow
         Department of Electronics & Electrical Engineering
         Room 519, Rankine Building, Oakfield Avenue,
         Glasgow, G12 8LT

Berns J. Buenaobra wrote:
> Hello I am new to this list. Recently I moved to LV7 Express Linux version
> because of the wanting of Ph.D. surpervisor to Mandrake 10.1.
> 
> I followed the instructions in the web site for COMEDI and with the help of
> my friend compiled them successfully!
> 
> I just want to be enlightened:
> 
> Q1: There will be no VIs that will  be added to the pallete with this
> drivers?
> Q2: Do you have to code in ANSI-C to execute Data Acquisition?
> Q3: You have to code the CIN for custom palettes for you to work in LabVIEW?
> 
> Are these questions correct?
> 
> Berns B.
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Jan Gukelberger" <g.u.g.i_at_gmx.de>
> To: "Bernd Porr" <BerndPorr_at_f2s.com>
> Cc: <comedi_at_comedi.org>
> Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2005 2:16 PM
> Subject: Re: Question about digital i/o cmd buffer data format in new driver
> 
> 
> 
>>On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 10:39 +0000, Bernd Porr wrote:
>>
>>>How fast do you need it? The DUX board is theoretically able to do it.
>>>The endpoint EP1 is suitbale for that. Would be 1kHz under USB 1.1 and
>>>8kHz under 2.0.
>>
>>1kHz would be the minimum requirement, faster is welcome but at the
>>moment not really needed. The concept looks interesting though we need
>>more than 8 + 8 IN lines so we'd have to use several boxes on each
>>system.
>>
>>
>>>Has to run then on a second comedi device because the
>>>analogue channels are using streaming already. Would be also possible to
>>>do a "soft PWM" with it. I'm just now busy with other stuff but I'll
>>>look into it. Has been on my todo list for quite a while.
>>
>>PWM? (sorry, I'm no daq expert)
>>
>>Yes, all in all those boxes would really be a consideration worth. How
>>much work would it be to setup a second device?
>>
>>
>>>/Bernd
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Jan
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>comedi mailing list
>>comedi_at_comedi.org
>>https://cvs.comedi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/comedi
>>
> 
> 