- From: Jan Gukelberger <g.u.g.i_at_gmx.de>
- Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 14:57:20 +0100
On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 16:08 +0000, Daniel Nilsson wrote: > Frank, > > I'm only concerned with input at this time, checking for the number of > samples received seems reasonable. My only concern with this is error > handling, which I don't know how to check for. Is it reasonable to think that > if I'm just waiting in a loop to see if I have sampled all my data that the > hardware could take some kind of error and stop ? In that case, I'm worrying > about being stuck in the loop waiting for data forever. Can I check somehow if > the command is process died due to an error ? [caution: I'm not an export and might just not know what I'm talking about. :-)] Well, I can't easily imagine a situation where the hardware just stops sampling, but if you're recording with a fixed sampling rate and you didn't receive any data for (some (small) constant)/(your sampling rate) you could quite reasonably suspect that there won't be any more data, couldn't you? > > Thanks > Daniel Jan
Received on 2005-03-19Z13:57:20