- From: David Schleef <ds_at_schleef.org>
- Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 17:57:14 -0700
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 09:26:57PM -0300, Pecenin wrote: > For AT-MIO-64E3, could be: ni_atmio.o? Yes. > For AT-MIO-16D10, could be: ni_atmio16d.o? or shoud be: ni_atmio.o? I'm not sure there ever was a AT-MIO-16D10. There was an AT-MIO-16D (which is the ni_atmio16d driver) and a -16DE-10 (which is the ni_atmio driver). > For AT-DIO-32F, is there one? No, but it would be very simple to write one. Apparently, one was written a few years ago, but it never got to me. dave...
Received on 2005-04-12Z23:57:14