Re: unrealistic settling time

Well, for anyone wondering, Petter's suggestion was absolutely the right 
solution. Thanks again.


Petter Strandh wrote:

>Are you shure the problem isn't electric. Usually there is a protecting
>capacitance on the reading channels. What can happen is that you carry
>charge between channels when you multiplex. If you short channel 0, what
>happens then.
>
>Unless I misinterpreted you, reading from an unconnected reading channel
>has undefined results. It should be connected with something that has a
>low impedance as possible. 
>
>Hope that I am not misleading you at this early hour.
>
>Regards
>Petter Strandh
>
>tor 2005-07-07 klockan 06.37 skrev Noah Watkins:
>  
>
>>Hi.
>>
>>I have a Measurement Computing PCI-DAS6025 board, though the question 
>>may not be specific to the board.
>>
>>In the User's Guide provided by the company, a settling time of 25 
>>microseconds was typical for reading two different channels 
>>consecutively and acquiring good data in the worst case.
>>
>>I am experiencing with the cb_pcidas64 driver a situation where delays 
>>much longer have to be introduced. For example with nine volts applied 
>>to channel 8, and nothing applied to channel 0:
>>
>>Reading from channel 8: ~9V
>>Reading from channel 0 to reset
>>Sleep for 50 microseconds
>>Reading from channel 0: ~7V
>>
>>In fact, it isn't until i sleep for around 80 _milli_seconds that i get 
>>readings that are reasonable. Given the sleep time limitation of 
>>instruction INSN_WAIT, all of my sleeping is occurring at the user 
>>level. This seems completely unrealistic.
>>
>>Has anyone ever encountered this degree of settling requirement before? 
>>Where might be a place to start investigating.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Noah W
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>comedi mailing list
>>comedi_at_comedi.org
>>https://cvs.comedi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/comedi
>>    
>>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>comedi mailing list
>comedi_at_comedi.org
>https://cvs.comedi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/comedi
>  
>

Received on 2005-07-07Z23:48:41