Re: LDP and comedi

> If you try to bring in outsiders who have no particular interest in comedi 
> beyond "getting all external drivers into the kernel", and have them run 
> off making massive changes on their own (even if they are trivial changes, 
> like changing all the whitespace conventions), you're likely to end up 
> with nothing but a dead fork bitrotting in the kernel.

Creating a fork isn't the idea at all.  It would be to work with
yourself and the other Comedi developers, to get the code into a shape
where it could be included and maintained within the mainline kernel
development processes.

I hope to be able to do other work with the Linux Driver Project, but I
wouldn't call myself a Comedi outsider, I've got a USB-DUX and have been
lurking on this list for a couple of years now.

As I see it the Linux Driver Project provides an opportunity for Comedi
development to become similar to other subsystem projects like the ALSA
and V4L/DVB projects.

So after the initial work of getting the Comedi subsystem included, the
Comedi maintainer would feed changes in to mainline kernel by sending
patches or a pull request to Linus during the merge window.  Internal
API changes or bug fixes might be made by the wider kernel development
community but these should be easily merged with the Comedi development
tree.

I think it would be a good thing for Comedi development.

Robert

Received on 2007-10-27Z21:27:48