- From: David Schleef <ds_at_schleef.org>
- Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 12:35:20 -0700
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 10:55:25AM -0700, Nick Winlund wrote: > Correct by the stale facts but incorrect in terms of > the logic of impartiality. Well, we wouldn't want facts to get in the way of analysis. I make no claims to be impartial. I run a for-profit company that makes (some) money off Comedi. Most Comedi services are run on computers and bandwidth privided by that company. It's been this way for *years*. Other people are likewise partial: Some are interested in seeing certain bugs fixed so they can continue with their PhD research. Others would like to get it into the mainline kernel. Some would like to see the mailing list administrative problems fixed. Frank, myself, Bernd, and Ian occasionally get together in a smoke-filled room (read: private email) and scheme to figure out how to best advance the project. We are advancing the project by moving the mailing list to a place with significantly less administrative overhead, so that we can spend more time coding. The worst case scenario for using google groups for list management is that the list would be shut down, and we'd have to (*gasp*) find a new home. If it happened suddenly, we might not be able to send a last "mailing list is moving" message, and people would have to figure it out by going to the web site. Doesn't look so bad. For everything else that I've seen mentioned, we have these things called "backups". It would be a strange and paranoid world indeed if backups did not exist. dave...
Received on 2007-10-29Z19:35:20