- From: Daniel Koch <danielkoch_at_gmx.net>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 00:08:12 +0200
Hi Frank, here is what our data looks like: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7232 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7227 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7982 3689 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8045 3700 1149 350 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8509 3954 1245 296 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9234 2986 1342 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8123 3509 1454 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7503 3216 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7217 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7427 3074 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8177 3200 1234 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7219 3326 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7145 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7215 234 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7214 115 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7207 345 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7223 216 0 When we increase the weight on our load cell, more and more channels get involved. The output looks almost like the output of your cmd program, though we only use a simple program that only reads data from every channel. Do we have a hardware problem with our MUX ? John told me that cutting cntr2 out line on the cable might solve the problem, but we didn`t try yet. Or is it probably a grounding problem ? The other problem we`ve got is that the data on channel 14 varies pretty much, even if there is no weight on the load cell..the data here should be more constant. Daniel > Can you send a couple lines of data so I can see exactly what you mean by > 'scattering'? > > Frank > > > > _______________________________________________ > comedi mailing list > comedi_at_stm.lbl.gov > http://stm.lbl.gov/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/comedi -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "Schlage die Trommel und fürchte dich nicht" (Heinrich Heine) Daniel Koch (danielkoch_at_gmx.net)
Received on 2002-06-16Z21:08:12