Re: Some documentation issues...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tuesday 08 April 2003 04:38 pm, Herman Bruyninckx wrote:
> BTW, I am spending quite some time on this documentation effort now.
> So, it would be nice to hear from you (and David Schleef) whether you
> think it's worthwhile going on with it. And to get some input. For
> example, which of the large set of new functions in the comedi API
> must get a documentation entry. Or do you think it has been a good

It seems to me the only (un-deprecated) function that doesn't have an entry
is comedi_data_read_n(), which would be fine to add of course.

- -- 
Frank

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE+lOUF5vihyNWuA4URAvybAJ0Qh3iU9itE2jraAXuD+mWKkBJlBwCdEok+
4fLroB0P48uNgp8wrlUzNuY=
=WeFO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Received on 2003-04-10Z02:29:08