- From: Nils Juergens <ju_at_isf.rwth-aachen.de>
- Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 10:42:22 +0100
On Mon, 08.12.03, Frank Mori Hess <fmhess_at_users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Eww don't do that to the driver, or if you do it shouldn't be put into > comedi. Either the hardware supports externally triggered scans or it > doesn't. When someone sees that the driver claims to support externally > triggered scans, they aren't going to appreciate that it supports them > with an unreliable hack (and what you are describing will always be > unreliable). Just like noone in the world understood that das-08 cards > didn't really support internally paced a/d conversions. In that case i have to think of something else (probably buying different hardware). And i thought this should be easy :) But i wonder why exactly this can't be done. I thought that with an RTAI realtime interrupt the latency should be deterministic. Is it just that interrupt latency + runtime of my IRQ handler is too long? thanks for your answers, Nils
Received on 2003-12-09Z09:42:22